The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JIN LI
__________
Appeal 2007-0436
Application 10/125,620
Technology Center 2100
__________
Decided: April 17, 2007
__________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and
JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-2, 4-12, 14-18, 20-24, and 26-28. Claims 3, 13, 19, and
25 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant’s disclosure relates to an automatic display of a popup
window containing a message resulting from a combination of values in a
plurality of areas of a graphical user interface (GUI). (Specification 2). The
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013