Appeal 2007-0436
Application 10/125,620
in part, proximately to a GUI control or field of most recent user
interaction;
allowing at least some GUI interaction to occur while said
popup is displayed; and
automatically dismissing said popup when said message has
been addressed.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art references in rejecting
the claims:
Evans US 6,799,286 B1 Sep. 28, 2004
(filed Apr. 21, 2000)
Grillo US 6,717,589 B1 Apr. 6, 2004
(filed Mar. 16, 2000)
The Examiner rejected claims 1-2, 4-12, 14-18, 20-24, and 26-28
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), as being unpatentable over Evans in view of
Grillo.
Rather than repeat the arguments here, we make reference to the Brief
and the Answer for the respective positions of Appellant and the Examiner.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The issue is whether Evans discloses an error message resulting from
a combination of values and whether the teachings of Evans and Grillo may
be properly combined to render the present claims obvious.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013