The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JACOBO BIBLIOWICZ, CAROLYN E. KREISEL, ROBERT LIPAIR and RYAN P. ROGERS ____________ Appeal 2007-0437 Application 09/982,224 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: April 23, 2007 ____________ Before JAME D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1 through 7, 9 through 16, 18 through 26, 28 through 35, 37 through 45, 47 through 54, 56 and 57. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013