Ex Parte Bibliowicz et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                           ____________                                              
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                           ____________                                              
                     Ex parte JACOBO BIBLIOWICZ, CAROLYN E. KREISEL,                                 
                              ROBERT LIPAIR and RYAN P. ROGERS                                       
                                           ____________                                              
                                         Appeal 2007-0437                                            
                                       Application 09/982,224                                        
                                      Technology Center 2100                                         
                                           ____________                                              
                                       Decided: April 23, 2007                                       
                                           ____________                                              

              Before JAME D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JAY P. LUCAS,                            
              Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                    This appeal involves claims 1 through 7, 9 through 16, 18 through 26,            
              28 through 35, 37 through 45, 47 through 54, 56 and 57.  We have                       
              jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                                          







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013