Appeal 2007-0437
Application 09/982,224
remarks in the paragraph bridging pages 22 and 23 of the Answer are well-
stated because it was well known in the art that transmission of data between
different computer systems utilizing a common server lends itself to the use
of this language. After all, HTML was also well known to be used in the
internet as a form of mark-up language to communicate between clients and
servers.
As to the object identifier feature of dependent claim 10, we are
satisfied that the Examiner provided sufficient evidence of this capability by
our earlier noted reference to the teachings at the top of column 4 of Kumar
with respect to its graphical object identifier. As to claim 11, the teachings
identified at columns 3 and 4 of Kumar clearly indicate the ability of his
system to operate on 3-D data.
Lastly, the collaboration palette of claim 16 merely broadly provides
information relating to collaborators in a collaboration session. This is
clearly depicted in figure 6 and figures 7A, 7B of Brown.
In view of the foregoing the decision of the Examiner rejecting all
claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013