Appeal 2007-0473
Application 09/969,584
CONCLUSION OF LAW
(1) Appellants have failed to establish that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 1 and 3-9 as being unpatentable under
35 U.S.C. § 102(e) over Tuttle.
(2) Appellants have failed to establish that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claim 2 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Tuttle and Younis.
(3) Claims 1-9 are not patentable.
DECISION
The Examiner's rejections of claims 1-9 are affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013