The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte JAVIT A. DRAKE, WILLIAM H. WILSON, and MATTHEW S. KLEE ________________ Appeal 2007-0489 Application 10/190,822 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: July 30, 2007 ________________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Statement of the Case This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 9-12, 15-19, 26, and 28-38. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. Appellants invented a fuel cell system that includes a main fuel cell, a fuel stream delivery system, an oxidant stream delivery system, and a sensorPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013