Appeal 2007-0493
Application 10/289,967
Patent 6,144,380
II. ISSUES
1. The first issue before the Board is whether Appellants have
established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 5-15, 17-37, 39-59,
61-85, and 87-101 under 35 U.S.C. § 251 based on recapture.
2. The second issue before the Board is whether Appellants have
established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-15, 17-37, 39-59,
61-85, and 87-101 under 35 U.S.C. § 251 based on a defective reissue oath.
3. The third issue before the Board is whether Appellants have
established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 5-11, 14-15, 17-18,
21-33, 36-37, 39-40, and 43-48 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Dickinson and More.
4. The fourth issue before the Board is whether Appellants have
established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 12-13, 19-20, 34-35,
and 41-42 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dickinson,
More, and Ballard.
5. The fifth issue before the Board is whether Appellants have
established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 49-55, 58-59, 61-62,
65-82, 85, 87, and 90-101 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Dickinson, More, and Vertelney.
6. The sixth issue before the Board is whether Appellants have
established that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 56-57, 63-64, 83-84,
and 88-89 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dickinson,
More, Vertelney, and Ballard.
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013