The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte HORST SCHMIDT
______________
Appeal 2007-0505
Application 10/402,476
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 11, 2007
_______________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 19 in the Office Action mailed
October 7, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a)
(2005).
We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claim 1 illustrates Appellant’s invention of a method of producing a
molded article, and is representative of the claims on appeal:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013