The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROBERT H. WOLLENBERG and THOMAS J. BALK __________ Appeal No. 2007-0510 Application No. 10/699,5071 ___________ Decided: 20 September 2007 ___________ Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1 A. STATEMENT OF CASE 2 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of 3 claims 1-45. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). 4 Appellants’ invention is directed to a high throughput screening 5 method and system for measuring the storage stability of lubricating oil 1 Application 10/699,507 was filed on October 31, 2003. The real party in interest is Chevron Oronite Company LLC.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013