Appeal 2007-0510
Application 10/699,507
1 H. DECISION
2 The rejection of 39-42 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated
3 by Kolosov is reversed.
4 The rejection of claims 1-9, 18-29, 38, and 43 under 35 U.S.C.
5 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov, O’Rear,
6 and Tolvanen is affirmed.
7 The rejection of claims 10-13, 30-33, 44, and 45 under 35 U.S.C.
8 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov, O’Rear,
9 Tolvanen, and Garr is affirmed.
10 The rejection of claims 14-17 and 34-37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
11 being unpatentable over the combination of Kolosov, O’Rear, Tolvanen, and
12 Smrcka is affirmed.
13 The provisional rejection of claims 1-3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20,
14 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, and 38-45 under the judicially created
15 doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over
16 claims 1, 3-9, 15-19, and 24-30 of copending Application 10/779,422 is
17 affirmed.
18 The provisional rejection of claims 1, 2, 13-18, 20-22, and 33-38
19 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as
20 being unpatentable over claims 20 and 22-30 of copending Application
21 10/699,529 is affirmed.
22 The provisional rejection of claims 1, 2, 13-17, 20, 22, 34-37, 39-42,
23 44, and 45 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double
24 patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 3, 10-18, 22, and 23 of
25 copending Application 10/699,508 is affirmed.
24
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013