Appeal 2007-0510 Application 10/699,507 1 The provisional rejection of claims 1, 2, 20, 22, 39, 41, and 44 under 2 the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being 3 unpatentable over claims 1, 13, 19-22, and 33-35 of copending Application 4 10/699,509 is affirmed. 5 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with 6 this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). 7 8 AFFIRMED-IN-PART cc (via U.S. Mail): Michael E. Carmen, Esq. M. CARMEN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 170 Old Country Road Suite 400 Mineola, NY 11051 25Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Last modified: September 9, 2013