Appeal 2007-0512
Application 10/310,744
parte prosecution prior to forwarding the application to the Board with a
suggestion for an interference, would have been proper and correct.
D. Decision
Upon consideration of the record and for the reasons given, the
Examiner's rejections are AFFIRMED.
The Examiner rejection of claims 26, 30, and 38–42 as anticipated
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) over Hubbard is AFFIRMED.
The Examiner's rejection of claims 27, 29, 30, 33, 34, 36, 43, and 44
as lacking an adequate written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, is
AFFIRMED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
lp
William J. Davis, Esq..
GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION
Legal Dept. Bldg.10
1361 Alps Road
Wayne NJ 07470
-21-
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Last modified: September 9, 2013