The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________________ Ex parte SIMPLIFICATION, LLC __________________ Appeal 2007-0518 Reexamination Control 90/006,9691 Patent 6,697,787 Technology Center 3600 ________________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ________________ Before JAMESON LEE, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL A. Statement of the Case This appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 306 is from a final rejection of claims 1-18 and 31-40. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on 1 Application for patent filed 15 March 2004.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013