The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN F. BROKER,
DOUGLAS W. GARDNER, ALAN V. NEUBAUER,
BRIAN L. NESS, and KIM L. WRIGHT
____________
Appeal 2007-0525
Application 09/919,7941
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 21, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final
rejection of claims 1-20. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed August 2, 2001, entitled "Information
Display System for an Appliance Incorporating Electronic Interface Screen."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013