Appeal 2007-0539 Application 10/264,026 purified Symbiodin[i]um spp. symbiont preparations showed endogenous levels of PsA, PsB, PsC, [and] PsD” (id. at ¶ 26). Claims 14-16, 18-20, 32-34, and 36-48 are pending, and stand rejected as follows:2 I. Claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Mohammadi.3 II. Claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Jacobs I.4 III. Claim 42 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Ghisalberti.5 IV. Claims 14-16, 18-20, and 37-48 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Jacobs II.6 V. Claims 33 and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Roussis.7 2 The most recent Examiner’s Answer (mailed May 23, 2006) contains what appear to be, at least in part, new or reinstated rejections. Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.39(b)(1)(2)(2006), Appellants have two options in responding to a new ground of rejection in the Answer: (1) request that prosecution be reopened before the Examiner; or (2) request that the appeal be maintained by filing a reply brief. Accordingly, Appellants’ Reply Brief, filed July 24, 2006, “in response to the Examiner’s Answer mailed 23 May 2006” (Reply Br. 1), will be treated as a request to maintain the appeal. 3 U.S. Patent 6,217,913 B1 to Mohammadi, issued April 7, 2001. 4 U.S. Patent 4,745,104 to Jacobs et al., issued May 17, 1988. 5 E.L. Ghisalberti, A Tricyclic Diterpene form Eremophila serrulata, 31 Phytochemistry 2168 (1992). 6 International Application WO 89/01334 by Jacobs et al., published February 23, 1989. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013