The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL CHIEN, MARTIN PEAKER, DAVID CHAN,
GARRY BRERETON, PETER KERSLAKE GIBBENS, PAUL ROBERTS,
PAUL ANTHONY THOMAS and
JONATHAN LESLIE CHRISTOPHER JACKSON
____________
Appeal 2007-0550
Application 10/763,714
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: September 26, 2007
____________
Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and
JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Daniel Chien et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 4, 6-8, 11-15 and 17-24, the only
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013