Ex Parte Chien et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0550                                                                                 
                Application 10.763,714                                                                           
                pending claims.  We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6                       
                (2002).                                                                                          

                                              THE INVENTION                                                      
                       Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a trailer wheel assembly                     
                including an inboard brake (Specification 1).  Claim 1 is representative of                      
                the claimed invention and reads as follows:                                                      
                             1. An axle assembly for a vehicle comprising:                                       
                                    an axle shaft having a first end and a second                                
                             end, said axle shaft mounted for rotation within a                                  
                             housing, said first end and said second end                                         
                             extending outside of said housing;                                                  
                                    a hub fixed to said first end of said axle                                   
                             shaft; and                                                                          
                                    a brake assembly including a rotor disposed                                  
                             outside of said housing and attached to said axle                                   
                             shaft adjacent said second end, wherein said                                        
                             second end is spaced apart from said hub a first                                    
                             length greater than an axial length of said housing.                                

                                              THE REJECTIONS                                                     
                       The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of                                     
                unpatentability:                                                                                 
                Anderson                        US 4,583,609               Apr. 22, 1986                        
                Inoue                           US 2002/0028721 A1 Mar. 07, 2002                                
                Seki                            US 2003/0136613 A1 Jul.  24, 2003                               
                Attinger (as translated)1        CH 663 387 A5              Dec. 15, 1987                        
                                                                                                                
                1 While we, like Appellants (Appeal Br. 5-6), find it difficult to understand                    
                why the Examiner waited until mailing of the first Answer (mailed March 2,                       
                2006, superseded by the Answer mailed July 11, 2006) to provide a                                
                                                       2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013