Appeal 2007-0559
Application 10/037,659
Has the applicant shown error in the obviousness rejection of claims 13 and
39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined teachings of Drexler
and Huth?
Has the applicant shown error in the obviousness rejection of claims 18-21,
25, 44-47, 51, and 66 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
teachings of Drexler and Poskanzer?
C. Summary of the Decision
The applicant has shown error in the rejection of all claims 1-90.
D Findings of Fact (Referenced as FF. ¶ No.)
1. The independent claims are claims 1, 27, 53, 67, 75, and 83.
2. Claim 1 recites a method for converting messaging data into a
relational table format in a database system, including a step for utilizing a
plurality of table formatting specifications to automatically build and store a table
function in the database system.
3. Claim 27 recites a computer readable medium containing
programming instructions for converting messaging data into a relational table
format in a database system, and specifies a series of functions performed by the
programming instructions, including utilizing a plurality of table formatting
specifications to automatically build and store a table function in the database
system.
4. Claim 53 recites a system for converting messaging data into a
relational table format in a database system, comprising several components
including a table function building application to automatically build and store a
table function in the database system.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013