Ex Parte Couch et al - Page 12



             Appeal 2007-0559                                                                               
             Application 10/037,659                                                                         
             Database Import Utility Program 40.  The appellants correctly state the following              
             (Substitute Appeal Br. 14: 5-10):                                                              
                   . . . while the database system can reside in the computer system, the                   
                   computer system and the database system are not one and the same.                        
                   Thus, using a utility application program in the computer system to                      
                   invoke the association is not equivalent to invoking the association                     
                   “from within the database system,” as recited in claims 1, 27 and 53,                    
                   and having an association that is invokable by the application program                   
                   is not equivalent to an “invocation mechanism [that] is invokable by                     
                   the database,” as recited in claims 67, 75 and 83.                                       
                   We reject the Examiner’s position that because a typical database program is             
             comprised of a collection of programs or program modules, it follows that the                  
             Email to Database Import Utility Program 40 can be regarded as a part of the                   
             database 80 in Drexler.  The Examiner must articulate some rational basis for                  
             regarding utility program 40 as a program within database 80.  That has not been               
             done here.  Utility program 40, as described by Drexler, appears to be independent             
             of database 80 and operates on its own without control or influence from database              
             80.  The Examiner has not demonstrated anything to the contrary.  The question is              
             not whether Email to Database Utility Program 40 of Drexler qualifies in some                  
             general manner as a database management program but whether it is in the same                  
             program as database 80 in Drexler.                                                             
                   For all of the foregoing reasons, the Examiner has not shown that Drexler                
             discloses a system including each and every element of claim 1, claim 27, or claim             
             53, or claim 67, claim 75, or claim 83.  Because each dependent claim includes all             
             the features of the claim on which it depends, the Examiner also has not shown                 
             that Drexler discloses a system including each and every element of any of claims              
             1-5, 10-12, 14-17, 22-24, 26-31, 36-38, 40-43, 48-50, 52-58, 64-65, and 67-90.                 


                                                     12                                                     

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013