Ex Parte Goble et al - Page 1





        1        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
        2              for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
        3                                                                                                   
        4              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
        5                                      ___________                                                  
        6                                                                                                   
        7                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
        8                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
        9                                      ___________                                                  
       10                                                                                                   
       11     Ex parte COLIN C.O. GOBLE, FRANCIS E. AMOAH and NIGEL M. GOBLE                                
       12                                      ___________                                                  
       13                                                                                                   
       14                                   Appeal 2007-0565                                                
       15                                 Application 10/374,097                                            
       16                                Technology Center 3700                                             
       17                                      ___________                                                  
       18                                                                                                   
       19                                Decided:  March 16, 2007                                           
       20                                      ___________                                                  
       21                                                                                                   
       22   Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR and ANTON W.                                       
       23   FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
       24   FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

       25                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
       26                                                                                                   
       27                                                                                                   
       28                                STATEMENT OF CASE                                                  
       29       This appeal involves claims 1-6, 8-16 and 37-42, the only claims pending in                 
       30   this application.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.                   

       31 §§ 6 and 134.31                                                                                                  

       32                                                                                                   
       33       We AFFIRM.                                                                                  










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013