Appeal 2007-0565
Application 10/374,097
1 insulating choke element and of a supply conductor which has a length of an odd
2 number of quarter wavelengths is prior art.
3 The Appellants have not separately argued these claims, which depend from
4 the claims whose rejection we sustained, supra. Accordingly we sustain the
5 Examiner's rejection of claims 14-16 and 39-42 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
6 obvious over Brayshaw, Garito, Ryan, Rigby and Appellants' admission that
7 provision of an insulating choke element and of a supply conductor which has a
8 length of an odd number of quarter wavelengths is prior art.
9 Claim 12 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Garito, Ryan, Rigby,
10 Rosen and Appellants' admission that provision of an insulating choke element and
11 of a supply conductor which has a length of an odd number of quarter wavelengths
12 is prior art.
13 The Appellants have not separately argued these claims, which depend from
14 the claims whose rejection we sustained, supra. Accordingly we sustain the
15 Examiner's rejection of claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Garito,
16 Ryan, Rigby, Rosen and Appellants' admission that provision of an insulating
17 choke element and of a supply conductor which has a length of an odd number of
18 quarter wavelengths is prior art.
19
20 DECISION
21 To summarize, our decision is as follows:
22 • The rejection of claims 1-6, 8-11, 13, 37 and 38 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
23 obvious over Garito, Ryan, Rigby and Appellants' admission that provision
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013