Ex Parte Runge et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written            
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               __________                                                   
                                   Ex parte MARSCHALL S. RUNGE,                                             
                        BENNETT VAN HOUTEN, and SCOTT W. BALLINGER                                          
                                               __________                                                   
                                            Appeal 2007-0582                                                
                                         Application 09/832,069                                             
                                         Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                                         Decided: April 23, 2007                                            
                                               __________                                                   
               Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and                                                     
               RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
               GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method                  
               of predicting atherosclerotic heart disease based on mitochondrial DNA                       
               damage.  The Examiner has rejected the claims as nonenabled and indefinite.                  
               We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We reverse.                                    
                                             BACKGROUND                                                     
                      The Specification states that “there is growing evidence that                         
               atherosclerotic lesions result from factors mediated by reactive oxygen                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013