Appeal 2007-0589
Application 09/852,959
(Filed Feb. 2, 2001)
We leave it to the Examiner to determine if Ashby and/or Fidler and
similar prior art describes the limitations recited in claims 12, 13, 20, and 26.
G. CONCLUSION
1. Appellants have established that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claims 12, 13, 20, and 26 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
over Boulter in view of McFedries (Internet Explorer).
H. DECISION
In view of the foregoing discussion, we reverse the Examiner’s
rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 12, 13, 20, and 26.
REVERSED
pgc
DILLON & YUDELL LLP
8911 NORTH CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY
SUITE 2110
AUSTIN TX 78759
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013