Appeal 2007-0603
Application 10/616,668
“facilitate” the transfer of the image to the print medium as set forth in claim
44 on appeal.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Anticipation has not been established by the Examiner because Takei
does not disclose each and every limitation of the claimed invention set forth
in claims 33, 38 to 41, 43 to 46, 49, 51, and 52.
Obviousness has not been established by the Examiner because Takei
neither teaches nor would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art
the subject matter set forth in claims 37, 47, 48, and 50.
DECISION
The anticipation rejection of claims 33, 38 to 41, 43 to 46, 49, 51, and
52 is reversed. The obviousness rejection of claims 37, 47, 48, and 50 is
reversed.
REVERSED
rwk
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Intellectual Property Administration
P. O. Box 272400
Fort Collins CO 80527-2400
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013