The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VIKTOR STOLLER, ARMIN OLBRICH,
JULIANE MEESE-MARKTSCHEFFEL,
WOLFGANG MATHY, MICHAEL ERB,
GEORG NIETFELD and GERHARD GILLE
____________
Appeal 2007-0617
Application 10/292,321
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: February 27, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 8, which are the only claims
pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013