Ex Parte Rubenstein - Page 3

               Appeal 2007-0631                                                                            
               Application 10/379,652                                                                      
                      rotating said device so that a longitudinal portion of said device                   
               engages on a portion of said board;                                                         
                      continuing to apply force to said device so as t move said board and                 
               said connector into said mated relationship; and                                            
                      retaining said device in an engaged position on said portion of said                 
               board, even after said external insertion force has been removed, said                      
               engaged position maintaining a force to bias said board into said connector                 
               and preventing said board from becoming disconnected from said connector                    
               at least in part by said first end of said device engaging said edge of said                
               housing.                                                                                    
               18. A printed wiring board (PWB) adapted for latching into a mated                          
               relationship with a housing mounted connector, said PWB comprising:                         
                      a protrusion for releasably accepting a latching mechanism, said                     
               latching mechanism operable, in conjunction with said protrusion, and with                  
               an outer portion of said housing, for maintaining positive force between said               
               PWB and said connector to maintain positive electrical contact between said                 
               PWB and said connector after externally applied insertion force has been                    
               removed.                                                                                    
                                                                                                          
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                    
               unpatentability:                                                                            
               Hristake   US 5,414,594   May   9, 1995                                                     
               Na    US 6,537,085   Mar. 25, 2003                                                          
                      The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                          
               1.  Claims 1-16 and 18-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                  
               anticipated by Hristake.                                                                    
               2.  Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as unpatentable over                   
               the combination of Hristake and Na.                                                         
                      We affirm-in-part.                                                                   



                                                    3                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013