Ex Parte Arya - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ___________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ___________                                                  
                                   Ex parte SATYA PRAKASH ARYA                                             
                                              ___________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0633                                               
                                         Application 10/132,844                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                            
                                              ___________                                                  
                                        Decided: March 30, 2007                                            
                                              ___________                                                  

                   Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and                                          
                   JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                   DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                          
               Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10 and 31-32.  Claims 11-30 and 33-                  
               36 have been canceled.                                                                      

               We AFFIRM.                                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013