Ex Parte Arya - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-0633                                                                            
               Application 10/132,844                                                                      

                                            BACKGROUND                                                     
                      Appellant’s invention relates to a method of manufacturing a                         
               suspension member for a disk drive using coining.  An understanding of the                  
               invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                      
               reproduced below.                                                                           
                      1.  A method of manufacturing a disk drive suspension member,                        
               comprising:                                                                                 
               forming said suspension member into a desired length and width                              
               configuration with a nominal thickness dimension;                                           
               forming one or more pockets in a surface of said suspension member;                         
               and                                                                                         
               treating said one or more pockets to minimize pocket depth tolerances                       
               and introduce hardness and strength into surface areas of said one or more                  
               pockets.                                                                                    

                                               PRIOR ART                                                   
                      The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in                    
               rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                          
               Arya    US 6,219,203 B1   Apr. 17, 2001                                                     
               Fahey     US 6,301,081 B1   Oct. 09, 2001                                                   
               Aoyagi   US 6,181,529 B1   Jan.  30, 2001                                                   

                                              REJECTIONS                                                   
                   Claims 1-10 and 31-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                    
               unpatentable over Arya in view of Fahey.  Aoyagi has been relied upon by                    
               the Examiner to support the use of Official Notice.                                         


                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013