Appeal 2007-0647
Application 10/421,366
DECISION
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude the
Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1-5, 7, 8, 14-18, 20, 21, 23-28, 30-
41, 43, and 45-53 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for obviousness. However, we
conclude Appellants have established that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claims 6, 9, 11-13, 22, 29, 42 and 44 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-9, 11-18,
and 20-53 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
21
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013