The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not
binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TEDDY M. KELLER, and DAWN D. DOMINGUEZ
____________
Appeal 2007-0650
Application 10/808,264
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 27, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 22, 23, 26, 27, 56, and 58. 1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm-in-part.
1 Claims 3-7, 24, 25, 28-31, and 57 are pending, but are not rejected
by the Examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013