Appeal 2007-0653
Application 10/338,254
monocrystalline silicon. Also, the Examiner should consider prior art
rejections for claims 11, 12, 19, and 21 if it is determined that
monocrystalline silicon can have multiple crystallographic planes.
Consequently, based on the foregoing, this application is remanded to
the Examiner for the reasons set forth above. 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1)(20]
This remand to the Examiner pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1)
(effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004), 1286
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)) is made for further
consideration of a rejection. Accordingly, 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(2) applies if
a Supplemental Examiner's Answer is written in response to this Remand by
the Board.
REMANDED
cam
Law Office of Delio & Peterson, LLC
121 Whitney Avenue
New Haven, CT 06510
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4
Last modified: September 9, 2013