The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CAROLYNN RAE JOHNSON
____________
Appeal 2007-0660
Application 10/116,574
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: April 30, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY,
and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 11 through 13. Claims 2, 5, 8, 10, 14,
and 15 have been cancelled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to
decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013