Ex Parte Johnson - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-0660                                                                                    
                 Application 10/116,574                                                                              
                        Appellant invented a method and system for allowing a user to                                
                 temporarily disable the automatic shutdown feature in a portable device.                            
                 (Specification 4).                                                                                  
                        Claim 1 is illustrative and representative of the claimed invention. It                      
                 reads as follows:                                                                                   
                        1. A method for suspending an automatic shutdown of a hand-held                              
                    device, the automatic shutdown resulting after a pre-specified time period                       
                    of inactivity of the hand-held device, the method comprising the steps of:                       
                        receiving a user input to suspend the automatic shutdown;                                    
                        disabling the automatic shutdown in response to the user input, such                         
                    that the hand-held device is shutdown only if a user of the hand-held                            
                    device manually shuts down the hand-held device;                                                 
                        automatically re-enabling the automatic shutdown to occur after the                          
                    pre-specified time period of inactivity, upon a subsequent power-up of                           
                    the hand-held device; and                                                                        
                        providing an audible warning that the automatic shutdown is                                  
                    imminent, at a pre-designated time prior to the automatic shutdown.                              

                 In rejecting the claims on appeal, the Examiner relied upon the                                     
                 following prior art:                                                                                
                 Kuroda    US 6,530,524 B1  Mar. 11, 2003                                                            
                 Taylor    US 6,685,683 B2  Mar. 8, 2005                                                             


                 The Examiner rejected the claims on appeal as follows:                                              
                 A.  Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 11 through 13 stand rejected under 35                              
                 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Taylor and                            
                 Kuroda.                                                                                             

                                                         2                                                           

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013