Appeal 2007-0660 Application 10/116,574 Appellant invented a method and system for allowing a user to temporarily disable the automatic shutdown feature in a portable device. (Specification 4). Claim 1 is illustrative and representative of the claimed invention. It reads as follows: 1. A method for suspending an automatic shutdown of a hand-held device, the automatic shutdown resulting after a pre-specified time period of inactivity of the hand-held device, the method comprising the steps of: receiving a user input to suspend the automatic shutdown; disabling the automatic shutdown in response to the user input, such that the hand-held device is shutdown only if a user of the hand-held device manually shuts down the hand-held device; automatically re-enabling the automatic shutdown to occur after the pre-specified time period of inactivity, upon a subsequent power-up of the hand-held device; and providing an audible warning that the automatic shutdown is imminent, at a pre-designated time prior to the automatic shutdown. In rejecting the claims on appeal, the Examiner relied upon the following prior art: Kuroda US 6,530,524 B1 Mar. 11, 2003 Taylor US 6,685,683 B2 Mar. 8, 2005 The Examiner rejected the claims on appeal as follows: A. Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 11 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Taylor and Kuroda. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013