Ex Parte Ishigaki - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                         
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                       
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                           Ex parte JUNJI ISHIGAKI                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                                Appeal 2007-0664                                                     
                                             Application 09/794,420                                                  
                                             Technology Center 2600                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                             Decided: April 17, 2007                                                 
                                                  ____________                                                       

                 Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and JAY P. LUCAS,                                           
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                       
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                        This appeal involves claims 10 through 15 and 19.  We have                                   
                 jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                                                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013