Ex Parte Huffman - Page 1

                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                             
                                       was not written for publication and                                           
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                        Ex parte JACKIE L. HUFFMAN                                                   
                                              Appeal No. 2007-0673                                                   
                                           Application No. 09/847,794                                                
                                             Technology Center 3600                                                  
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                         
                 Before TERRY J. OWENS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS and ROBERT E.                                            
                 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 of the final                              
                 rejection of claims 1 through 18.  For the reasons stated infra we will not                         
                 sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.                                                   

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013