The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PANKAI K. JHA
____________
Appeal 2007-0708
Application 09/881,367
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: May 15, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JAY P. LUCAS
Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Appellant invented a method and system for bridging an incoming
packet from a first network (104) to a second network (106). Particularly, a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013