Appeal 2007-0708
Application 09/881,367
invention, would have concluded that Ogawa, alone or in combination with
Wilford, renders the claimed invention unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a).
DECISION
We affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 through 8 and 10
through 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Ogawa. We
also affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claim 9 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ogawa. Additionally, we affirm the
Examiner’s decision to reject claims 18 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over the combination of Ogawa and Wilford.
AFFIRMED
KIS
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
198 CHAMPION COURT
SAN JOSE, CA 95134
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: September 9, 2013