1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte NANCY C. CHEUNG and RUPINDER S. KATARIA
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0717
15 Application 09/993,277
16 Technology Center 2100
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: May 18, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before HUBERT C. LORIN, STUART S. LEVY and ANTON W. FETTING,
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 DECISION ON APPEAL
26
27
28 STATEMENT OF CASE
29 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20, the only claims
30 pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction
31 over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
32
33 We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013