Ex Parte 6428526 et al - Page 10

                Appeal 2007-0724                                                                                
                Reexamination Control 90/006,775                                                                
                Patent 6,428,526                                                                                
           1    absorbent article having a fastening system comprising hook and loop                            
           2    material.  Answer 5.  The examiner explains the rejection as follows                            
           3    (Answer 5):                                                                                     
           4           As set forth supra in the Claim Interpretation section, these                            
           5           claims are interpreted to require the capability of releasable                           
           6           engagement of the stemlike projections of the hook material                              
           7           with the disposable absorbent article . . . .  The Dragoo ‘622                           
           8           article . . . includes all the claimed structure prior to packaging                      
           9           and also teaches that the stemlike projections of the hook                               
          10           material releasably engage with the outer cover or the outer                             
          11           surface or with a loop material, and thus conceals or covers the                         
          12           stemlike projections, to form a pant-like structure during use.                          
          13           Therefore there is sufficient factual basis for one to conclude                          
          14           that the capabilities of the claimed structure are also inherent in                      
          15           the same structure of the Dragoo article.  [Emphasis added.]                             
          16                                                                                                    
          17           As explained above, claim 1 requires a package of disposable                             
          18    absorbent articles comprising a plurality of absorbent articles each having a                   
          19    pant-like structure in the package.  The examiner has not directed us to any                    
          20    disclosure in Dragoo, Buell, or Nestegard which describes, either expressly                     
          21    or inherently, a package of absorbent articles comprising a plurality of                        
          22    absorbent articles each having a pant-like structure in the package.  For this                  
          23    reason, we find that the examiner has failed to establish that Dragoo, and by                   
          24    incorporation, Buell and Nestegard anticipate the subject matter of claim 1.                    
          25           Similarly, the examiner has failed to explain why the combined                           
          26    teachings of Dragoo, Buell, and Nestegard would have rendered obvious a                         
          27    package of absorbent articles wherein each absorbent article has a pant-like                    
          28    structure in the package.  To the extent that the diaper in Dragoo is                           
          29    “capable” of being packaged in a pant-like structure, this capability alone is                  
          30    not sufficient to establish that the claimed invention would have been                          

                                                      10                                                        

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013