The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARND BOTTCHER, DOMINIC VANOPPEN,
and JAN-DIRK ARNDT
____________
Appeal 2007-0736
Application 10/480,239
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 14, 2007
____________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS and
NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case.1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
1 The application was filed December 10, 2003 and was published
September 9, 2004. The real party in interest is BASF Aktiengesellschaft.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013