Appeal No. 2007-0737
Application No. 10/290,606
For the foregoing reasons, we find sufficient evidence of record to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness of claim 1. Appellant has not
provided adequate evidence to rebut it. Accordingly, the rejection of claim 1
is affirmed. Claims 2-5, 7, 9, and 10 fall with claim 1.
TIME PERIOD
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Eric Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Nancy J. Linck )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Richard M. Lebovitz )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013