Appeal No. 2007-0739 Application No. 11/043,655 2. Rejections over Sawka Claims 1-3 and 5-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sawka. As Appellant did not argue the claims separately (Br. 6)5, we focus our analysis on claim 1. 37 CFR § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (2006). Due to its brevity, the rejection is set forth below. Sawka discloses a multilayer film comprising an adhesive (base layer) (24), a decorative layer (23) overlying the base layer and a base layer (seal layer) (12) overlying the decorative layer (column 8, lines 34-44 and Figure 1) where color layers (20) and (22) are not used at all (column 7, lines 62-65). The seal layer (12) is clear (column 5, lines 18-19) and the decorative layer (23) comprises pigments and dyes (column 8, lines 5-14 and 34-37). The base layer (24) may incorporate pigments and is comprised of rubber, which is a non- electrically conductive material (column 8, lines 42-53). Sawka discloses common surfaces of the invention include floormats (column 10, lines 47-56). Answer 4. As noted above, claim 1 is drawn to a chairmat comprising: (1) a planar substrate layer having a first side which rests on the floor and a second side opposite from the first side; (2) a decorative substrate layer disposed directly on the first layer; and (3) a transparent seal layer disposed directly on the decorative material. 5 The Brief refers to claims 1-3, 5, 8-10, and 12-14 (Br. 6). But as the Action mailed January 27, 2006, also states that claims 1-3 and 5-11 stood rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sawka, id. at 3, we will treat the rejection as applying to claims 1-3 and 5-11. Similarly, we will treat the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Sawka as applying to claims 4 and 12-16. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013