The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID J. THOMSON
____________
Appeal 2007-0759
Application 10/177,732
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: May 25, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1 to 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant has invented a method of estimating a channel. The method
employs one or more basis functions that describe the channel based on
statistics of the channel, and the method employs one or more waveforms
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013