The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte SHELL STERLING SIMPSON, WARD SCOTT FOSTER, and KRIS R. LIVINGSTON __________ Appeal No. 2007-0781 Application No. 10/003,150 Technology Center 3600 __________ Decided: September 19, 2007 __________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and HUBERT C. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-4, 7, 11-13, and 30.1 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). 1 Claims 5, 6, 8-10, and 14-29 have been canceled.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013