1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
2 was not written for publication and
3 is not binding precedent of the Board.
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
8 _____________
9
10 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
11 AND INTERFERENCES
12 _____________
13
14 Ex parte TRACY L. FRANCIS, MARK W. JONES and
15 RICHARD F. ROBINSON
16 _____________
17
18 Appeal No. 2007-0793
19 Application No. 09/875,487
20 Technology Center 3600
21 ______________
22
23 Decided: March 22, 2007
24 _______________
25
26 Before TERRY J. OWENS, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E. HORNER,
27 Administrative Patent Judges.
28
29 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
30
31
32 DECISION ON APPEAL
33
34 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final
35 rejection of claims 15 through 33. For the reasons stated infra we will not
36 sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013