The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHINJI TOYOYAMA and YUICHI SATO
____________
Appeal 2007-0803
Application 10/197,801
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: May 15, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and MAHSHID D.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 5, 10 through 12, 14 through 17, and
21 through 25, Appellants having canceled claims 2 through 4, 6 through 9,
13, and 18 through 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and
134(a).
Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below as best
representative of the disclosed and claimed invention:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013