Appeal 2007-0811
Application 10/128,997
CONCLUSION
The Examiner has not established the prima facie obviousness of
claims 21 and 30-33 which call for a guidewire insertion. The case is
remanded to the Examiner for further consideration of this issue.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-19 and 22-29 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a) (1) (iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART; REMANDED
vsh
SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG,
WOESSNER & KLUTH, P.A.
P.O. BOX 2938
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013