The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MELANEE OMAR
__________
Appeal 2007-0816
Application 11/095,887
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: April 6, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a car seat
for a child or infant. The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated
and obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
“Infant/child car seats are commonly used to conveniently and safely
seat and transport infants and small children. . . . One problem with
conventional car seats is that in order to release a child from the car seat an
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013