1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
2 written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte GREGORY A. HOLBROOK, GRAHAM R. BROOKES, and
13 DANIEL L. NORDMEYER
14 _____________
15
16 Appeal 2007-0818
17 Application 10/601,448
18 Technology Center 3600
19 ______________
20
21 Decided: April 10, 2007
22 _______________
23
23 Before STUART S. LEVY, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E. HORNER,
24
24 Administrative Patent Judges.
25
26
26 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
27
28
29
30 DECISION ON APPEAL
31
32 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002) of the final
33 rejection of claims 24 through 46. For the reasons stated infra we will not sustain
34 the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
35
36
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013