Appeal 2007-0818 Application 10/601,448 1 INVENTION 2 3 The invention is directed to a method of determining the appropriate 4 conditions for leveling a vehicle using an air adjustable suspension system. See 5 pages 3 and 4 of Appellants’ Specification. Claim 24 representative of the 6 invention and reproduced below: 7 24. A method of performing a leveling action on a vehicle having a height 7 adjustable air suspension system and undergoing a vehicle acceleration, said 8 8 method comprising steps of: 9 10 a) initiating a leveling action adjusting said suspension system toward a pre- 10 determined height condition of the vehicle; 11 12 b) discontinuing said leveling action upon the vehicle acceleration exceeding 12 a first pre-determined acceleration threshold prior to said suspension system 13 13 achieving said pre-determined height condition; 14 15 c) waiting until the vehicle acceleration decreases below a second pre- 15 determined acceleration threshold that is less than said first pre-determined 16 16 threshold; and, 17 18 d) continuing said leveling action adjusting said suspension system toward 18 said pre-determined height condition. 19 20 21 22 REFERENCES 23 24 The references relied upon by the Examiner are: 25 26 Karnopp US 5,346,242 Sep. 13, 1994 27 Raad US 5,430,647 Jul. 4, 1995 28 Shono US 6,298,292 B1 Oct. 2, 2001 29 30 31 REJECTIONS AT ISSUE 32 Claims 24 through 27, and 29 through 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 33 § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over Shono in view of Raad. The Examiner’s 34 rejection is set forth on pages 2 through 4 of the Final Office action mailed March 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013