Ex Parte Holbrook et al - Page 2

             Appeal 2007-0818                                                                                  
             Application 10/601,448                                                                            

        1                                     INVENTION                                                        
        2                                                                                                      
        3          The invention is directed to a method of determining the appropriate                        
        4    conditions for leveling a vehicle using an air adjustable suspension system.  See                 
        5    pages 3 and 4 of Appellants’ Specification.  Claim 24 representative of the                       
        6    invention and reproduced below:                                                                   
        7          24. A method of performing a leveling action on a vehicle having a height                   
        7 adjustable air suspension system and undergoing a vehicle acceleration, said                         
        8                                                                                                      
        8 method comprising steps of:                                                                          
        9                                                                                                      
       10          a) initiating a leveling action adjusting said suspension system toward a pre-              
       10 determined height condition of the vehicle;                                                          
       11                                                                                                      
       12          b) discontinuing said leveling action upon the vehicle acceleration exceeding               
       12 a first pre-determined acceleration threshold prior to said suspension system                        
       13                                                                                                      
       13 achieving said pre-determined height condition;                                                      
       14                                                                                                      
       15          c) waiting until the vehicle acceleration decreases below a second pre-                     
       15 determined acceleration threshold that is less than said first pre-determined                        
       16                                                                                                      
       16 threshold; and,                                                                                      
       17                                                                                                      
       18          d) continuing said leveling action adjusting said suspension system toward                  
       18 said pre-determined height condition.                                                                
       19                                                                                                      
       20                                                                                                      
       21                                                                                                      
       22                                      REFERENCES                                                      
       23                                                                                                      
       24          The references relied upon by the Examiner are:                                             
       25                                                                                                      
       26          Karnopp             US 5,346,242              Sep. 13, 1994                                 
       27          Raad                US 5,430,647              Jul.  4, 1995                                 
       28          Shono               US 6,298,292 B1           Oct.  2, 2001                                 
       29                                                                                                      
       30                                                                                                      
       31                                 REJECTIONS AT ISSUE                                                  
       32          Claims 24 through 27, and 29 through 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
       33    § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over Shono in view of Raad.  The Examiner’s                       
       34    rejection is set forth on pages 2 through 4 of the Final Office action mailed March               

                                                       2                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013